Question 1. What is Thread in java?
Answer.
- Threads consumes CPU in best possible manner, hence enables
multi processing. Multi threading reduces idle time of CPU which
improves performance of application.
- Thread are light weight process.
- A thread class belongs to java.lang package.
- We can create multiple threads in java, even if we don’t create any Thread, one Thread at least do exist i.e. main thread.
- Multiple threads run parallely in java.
- Threads have their own stack.
- Advantage of Thread : Suppose one thread needs 10 minutes to
get certain task, 10 threads used at a time could complete that task in 1
minute, because threads can run parallely.
Question 2. What is difference between Process and Thread in java?
Answer. One process can have multiple Threads,
Thread are subdivision of Process. One or more Threads runs in the
context of process. Threads can execute any part of process. And same
part of process can be executed by multiple Threads.
Processes have their own copy of the data segment of the parent
process while Threads have direct access to the data segment of its
process.
Processes have their own address while Threads share the address space of the process that created it.
Process creation needs whole lot of stuff to be done, we might need
to copy whole parent process, but Thread can be easily created.
Processes can easily communicate with child processes but
interprocess communication is difficult. While, Threads can easily
communicate with other threads of the same process using
wait() and notify() methods.
In process all threads share system resource like heap Memory etc. while Thread has its own stack.
Any change made to process does not affect child processes, but any
change made to thread can affect the behavior of the other threads of
the process.
Example to see where threads on are created on different processes and same process.
Question 3. How to implement Threads in java?
Answer. This is very basic threading question. Threads can be created in two ways i.e. by
implementing java.lang.Runnable interface or extending java.lang.Thread class and then extending run method.
Thread has its own variables and methods, it lives and dies on the heap.
But a thread of execution is an individual process that has its own call stack. Thread are lightweight process in java.
- Thread creation by implementingjava.lang.Runnableinterface.
We will create object of class which implements Runnable interface :
MyRunnable runnable=new MyRunnable();
Thread thread=new Thread(runnable);
2) And then create Thread object by calling constructor and passing reference of Runnable interface i.e. runnable object :
Thread thread=new Thread(runnable);
Question 4 . Does Thread implements their own Stack, if yes how? (Important)
Answer. Yes,
Threads have their own stack. This is very interesting question, where interviewer tends to check your basic knowledge about how
threads internally maintains their own stacks. I’ll be explaining you the concept by diagram.
Question 5. We should implement Runnable interface or extend
Thread class. What are differences between implementing Runnable and
extending Thread?
Answer. Well the answer is you must
extend Thread only when you are looking to modify run() and other methods as well. If you are simply looking to modify only the run() method
implementing Runnable is the best option (Runnable interface has only one abstract method i.e. run() ).
Differences between implementing Runnable interface and extending Thread class -
- Multiple inheritance in not allowed in java : When we implement Runnable
interface we can extend another class as well, but if we extend Thread
class we cannot extend any other class because java does not allow
multiple inheritance. So, same work is done by implementing Runnable and
extending Thread
but in case of implementing Runnable we are still left with option of
extending some other class. So, it’s better to implement Runnable.
- Thread safety
: When we implement Runnable interface, same object is shared amongst
multiple threads, but when we extend Thread class each and every thread
gets associated with new object.
- Inheritance (Implementing Runnable is lightweight operation) : When
we extend Thread unnecessary all Thread class features are inherited,
but when we implement Runnable interface no extra feature are inherited,
as Runnable only consists only of one abstract method i.e. run()
method. So, implementing Runnable is lightweight operation.
- Coding to interface : Even java recommends coding to interface. So,
we must implement Runnable rather than extending thread. Also, Thread
class implements Runnable interface.
- Don’t extend unless you wanna modify fundamental behaviour of
class, Runnable interface has only one abstract method i.e. run() : We
must extend Thread only when you are looking to modify run() and other methods as well. If you are simply looking to modify only the run() method implementing Runnable
is the best option (Runnable interface has only one abstract method
i.e. run() ). We must not extend Thread class unless we're looking to
modify fundamental behaviour of Thread class.
- Flexibility in code when we implement Runnable : When we extend
Thread first a fall all thread features are inherited and our class
becomes direct subclass of Thread , so whatever action we are doing is
in Thread class. But, when we implement Runnable we create a new thread
and pass runnable object as parameter,we could pass runnable object to
executorService & much more. So, we have more options when we
implement Runnable and our code becomes more flexible.
- ExecutorService : If we implement Runnable, we can start multiple
thread created on runnable object with ExecutorService (because we can
start Runnable object with new threads), but not in the case when we
extend Thread (because thread can be started only once).
Question 6. How can you say Thread behaviour is unpredictable? (Important)
Answer. The solution to question is quite simple,
Thread behaviour is unpredictable
because execution of Threads depends on Thread scheduler, thread
scheduler may have different implementation on different platforms like
windows, unix etc. Same threading program may produce different output
in subsequent executions even on same platform.
To achieve we are going to create 2 threads on same Runnable Object,
create for loop in run() method and start both threads. There is no
surety that which threads will complete first, both threads will enter
anonymously in for loop.
Question 7 . When threads are not lightweight process in java?
Answer. Threads are
lightweight process
only if threads of same process are executing concurrently. But if
threads of different processes are executing concurrently then threads
are
heavy weight process.
Question 8. How can you ensure all threads that started from main
must end in order in which they started and also main should end in
last? (Important)
Answer. Interviewers tend to know interviewees knowledge about
Thread methods. So this is time to prove your point by answering
correctly. We can use
join() methodto
ensure all threads that started from main must end in order in which
they started and also main should end in last.In other words waits for
this thread to die. Calling join() method internally calls join(0);
DETAILED
DESCRIPTION : Join() method - ensure all threads that started from main
must end in order in which they started and also main should end in
last. Types of join() method with programs- 10 salient features of join.
Question 9.What is difference between starting thread with run() and start() method? (Important)
Answer. This is quite interesting question, it might confuse you a bit and at time may make you think is there really any
difference between starting thread with run() and start() method.
When you call start() method, main thread internally calls run()
method to start newly created Thread, so run() method is ultimately
called by newly created thread.
When you call run() method main thread rather than starting run() method with newly thread it start run() method by itself.
Question 10. What is significance of using Volatile keyword? (Important)
Answer. Java allows threads to access shared variables. As a rule, to
ensure that shared variables are consistently updated, a thread should
ensure that it has exclusive use of such variables by obtaining a lock
that enforces mutual exclusion for those shared variables.
If a field is declared
volatile, in that case the Java memory model ensures that all threads see a consistent value for the variable.
Few small questions>
Q. Can we have
volatile methods in java?
- No, volatile is only a keyword, can be used only with variables.
Q. Can we have synchronized variable in java?
- No, synchronized can be used only with methods, i.e. in method declaration.
Question 11. Differences between synchronized and volatile keyword in Java? (Important)
Answer.Its very important question from interview perspective.
- Volatilecan be used as a keyword against the variable, we cannot use volatile against method declaration.
volatile void method1(){} //it’s illegal, compilation error.
While
synchronization
can be used in method declaration or we can create synchronization
blocks (In both cases thread acquires lock on object’s monitor).
Variables cannot be synchronized.
Synchronized method:
synchronized void method2(){} //legal
Synchronized block:
void method2(){
synchronized (this) {
//code inside synchronized block.
}
}
Synchronized variable (illegal):
synchronized int i;//it’s illegal, compilatiomn error.
- Volatile does not acquire any lock on variable or object, but Synchronization acquires lock on method or block in which it is used.
- Volatile variables are not cached, but variables used inside synchronized method or block are cached.
- When volatile is used will never create deadlock in program, as
volatile never obtains any kind of lock . But in case if
synchronization is not done properly, we might end up creating dedlock
in program.
- Synchronization may cost us performance issues, as one thread
might be waiting for another thread to release lock on object. But
volatile is never expensive in terms of performance.
Question 12. Can you again start Thread?
Answer.No,
we cannot start Thread again,
doing so will throw runtimeException
java.lang.IllegalThreadStateException. The reason is once run() method
is executed by Thread, it goes into
dead state.
Let’s take an example-
Thinking of starting thread again and calling start() method on it
(which internally is going to call run() method) for us is some what
like asking dead man to wake up and run. As, after completing his life
person goes to dead state.
Question 13. What is race condition in multithreading and how can we solve it? (Important)
Answer. This is very important question, this forms the core of multi threading, you should be able to explain about
race condition in detail. When more than one thread try to access same resource without synchronization causes race condition.
So we can
solve race condition by using either
synchronized block or synchronized method. When no two threads can access same resource at a time phenomenon is also called as mutual exclusion.
Few sub questions>
What if two threads try to read same resource without
synchronization?
When two threads try to read on same resource without synchronization, it’s never going to create any problem.
What if two threads try to write to same resource without
synchronization?
When two threads try to write to same resource without synchronization, it’s going to create synchronization problems.
Question 14. How threads communicate between each other?
Answer. This is very must know question for all the interviewees, you
will most probably face this question in almost every time you go for
interview.
Threads can communicate with each other by using
wait(), notify() and notifyAll() methods.
Question 15. Why wait(), notify() and notifyAll() are in Object class and not in Thread class? (Important)
Answer.
- Every Object has a monitor, acquiring that monitors allow
thread to hold lock on object. But Thread class does not have any
monitors.
- wait(), notify() and notifyAll()are called on objects only
>When wait() method is called on object by thread it waits for
another thread on that object to release object monitor by calling notify() or notifyAll() method on that object.
When notify() method is called on object by thread it notifies all the threads
which are waiting for that object monitor that object monitor is available now.
So, this shows that wait(), notify() and notifyAll() are called on objects only.
Now, Straight forward question that comes to mind is how thread acquires object lock by
acquiring object monitor? Let’s try to understand this basic concept in detail?
- Wait(), notify() and notifyAll() method being in Object class
allows all the threads created on that object to communicate with other.
.
- As multiple threads exists on same object. Only one thread can hold
object monitor at a time. As a result thread can notify other threads
of same object that lock is available now. But, thread having these
methods does not make any sense because multiple threads exists on
object its not other way around (i.e. multiple objects exists on
thread).
- Now let’s discuss one hypothetical scenario, what will happen if
Thread class contains wait(), notify() and notifyAll() methods?
Having wait(), notify() and notifyAll() methods means Thread class also must have their monitor.
Every thread having their monitor will create few problems -
>Thread communication problem.
>Synchronization on object won’t be possible- Because object has
monitor, one object can have multiple threads and thread hold lock on
object by holding object monitor. But if each thread will have monitor,
we won’t have any way of achieving synchronization.
>Inconsistency in state of object (because synchronization won't be possible).
Question 16. Is it important to acquire object lock before calling wait(), notify() and notifyAll()?
Answer.Yes, it’s mandatory to acquire object lock before calling
these methods on object. As discussed above wait(), notify() and
notifyAll() methods are always called from
Synchronized block
only, and as soon as thread enters synchronized block it acquires
object lock (by holding object monitor). If we call these methods
without acquiring object lock i.e. from outside synchronize block then
java.lang. IllegalMonitorStateException is thrown at runtime.
Wait() method needs to enclosed in try-catch block, because it throws compile time exception i.e. InterruptedException.
Question 17. How can you solve consumer producer problem by using wait() and notify() method? (Important)
Answer. Here come the time to answer very very important question
from interview perspective. Interviewers tends to check how sound you
are in threads inter communication. Because for solving this problem we
got to use synchronization blocks, wait() and notify() method very
cautiously. If you misplace synchronization block or any of the method,
that may cause your program to go horribly wrong. So, before going into
this question first i’ll recommend you to understand how to use
synchronized blocks, wait() and notify() methods.
Key points we need to ensure before programming :
>Producer will produce total of 10 products and cannot produce
more than 2 products at a time until products are being consumed by
consumer.
Example> when sharedQueue’s size is 2, wait for consumer to
consume (consumer will consume by calling remove(0) method on
sharedQueue and reduce sharedQueue’s size). As soon as size is less than
2, producer will start producing.
>Consumer can consume only when there are some products to consume.
Example> when sharedQueue’s size is 0, wait for producer to
produce (producer will produce by calling add() method on sharedQueue
and increase sharedQueue’s size). As soon as size is greater than 0,
consumer will start consuming.
Explanation of Logic >
We will create sharedQueue that will be shared amongst Producer and Consumer. We will now start consumer and producer thread.
Note: it does not matter order in which threads are started (because
rest of code has taken care of synchronization and key points mentioned
above)
First we will start consumerThread >
consumerThread.start();
consumerThread will enter run method and call consume() method. There it will check for sharedQueue’s size.
-if size is equal to 0 that means producer hasn’t produced any
product, wait for producer to produce by using below piece of code-
synchronized (sharedQueue) {
while (sharedQueue.size() == 0) {
sharedQueue.wait();
}
}
-if size is greater than 0, consumer will start consuming by using below piece of code.
synchronized (sharedQueue) {
Thread.sleep((long)(Math.random() * 2000));
System.out.println("consumed : "+ sharedQueue.remove(0));
sharedQueue.notify();
}
Than we will start producerThread >
producerThread will enter run method and call produce() method. There it will check for sharedQueue’s size.
-if size is equal to 2 (i.e. maximum number of products which
sharedQueue can hold at a time), wait for consumer to consume by using
below piece of code-
synchronized (sharedQueue) {
while (sharedQueue.size() == maxSize) { //maxsize is 2
sharedQueue.wait();
}
}
-if size is less than 2, producer will start producing by using below piece of code.
synchronized (sharedQueue) {
System.out.println("Produced : " + i);
sharedQueue.add(i);
Thread.sleep((long)(Math.random() * 1000));
sharedQueue.notify();
}
Question 18. How
to solve Consumer Producer problem without using wait() and notify()
methods, where consumer can consume only when production is over.?
Answer. In this problem, producer will allow consumer to consume only
when 10 products have been produced (i.e. when production is over).
We will approach by keeping one boolean variable productionInProcess
and initially setting it to true, and later when production will be over
we will set it to false.
Question 19. How can you solve consumer producer pattern by using BlockingQueue? (Important)
Answer. Now it’s time to gear up to face question which is most
probably going to be followed up by previous question i.e. after how to
solve consumer producer problem using wait() and notify() method.
Generally you might wonder why interviewer's are so much interested in
asking about
solving consumer producer problem using BlockingQueue,
answer is they want to know how strong knowledge you have about java
concurrent Api’s, this Api use consumer producer pattern in very
optimized manner, BlockingQueue is designed is such a manner that it
offer us the best performance.
BlockingQueue is a interface and we will use its implementation class LinkedBlockingQueue.
Key methods for solving consumer producer pattern are >
put(i); //used by producer to put/produce in sharedQueue.
take();//used by consumer to take/consume from sharedQueue.
Question 20. What is deadlock in multithreading? Write a program to form DeadLock in multi threading and also how to solve DeadLock situation. What measures you should take to avoid deadlock? (Important)
Answer. This is very important question from interview perspective.
But, what makes this question important is it checks interviewees
capability of
creating and detecting deadlock.
If you can write a code to form deadlock, than I am sure you must be
well capable in solving that deadlock as well. If not, later on this
post we will learn how to solve deadlock as well.
First question comes to mind is,
what is deadlock in multi threading program?
Deadlock is a situation where two threads are waiting for each other to release lock holded by them on resources.
But how
deadlock could be formed :
Thread-1 acquires lock on String.class and then calls
sleep()
method which gives Thread-2 the chance to execute immediately after
Thread-1 has acquired lock on String.class and Thread-2 acquires lock on
Object.class then calls sleep() method and now it waits for Thread-1 to
release lock on String.class.
Conclusion:
Now, Thread-1 is waiting for Thread-2 to release lock on Object.class
and Thread-2 is waiting for Thread-1 to release lock on String.class
and deadlock is formed.
//Code called by Thread-1
public void run() {
synchronized (String.class) {
Thread.sleep(100);
synchronized (Object.class) {
}
}
}
//Code called by Thread-2
publicvoid run() {
synchronized (Object.class) {
Thread.sleep(100);
synchronized (String.class) {
}
}
}
Here comes the important part, how above formed deadlock could be solved :
Thread-1 acquires lock on String.class and then calls
sleep()
method which gives Thread-2 the chance to execute immediately after
Thread-1 has acquired lock on String.class and Thread-2 tries to acquire
lock on String.class but lock is holded by Thread-1. Meanwhile,
Thread-1 completes successfully. As Thread-1 has completed successfully
it releases lock on String.class, Thread-2 can now acquire lock on
String.class and complete successfully without any deadlock formation.
Conclusion: No deadlock is formed.
//Code called by Thread-1
publicvoid run() {
synchronized (String.class) {
Thread.sleep(100);
synchronized (Object.class) {
}
}
}
//Code called by Thread-2
publicvoid run() {
synchronized (String.class) {
Thread.sleep(100);
synchronized (Object.class) {
}
}
}
Few important measures to avoid
Deadlock >
- Lock specific member variables of class rather than locking
whole class: We must try to lock specific member variables of class
rather than locking whole class.
- Use join() method: If possible try touse join() method,
although it may refrain us from taking full advantage of multithreading
environment because threads will start and end sequentially, but it can
be handy in avoiding deadlocks.
- If possible try avoid using nested synchronization blocks.
Question 21. Have you ever generated thread dumps or analyzed Thread Dumps? (Important)
Answer. Answering this questions will show your in depth knowledge of
Threads. Every experienced must know how to generate Thread Dumps.
VisualVM
is most popular way to generate Thread Dump and is most widely used by
developers. It’s important to understand usage of VisualVM for in depth
knowledge of VisualVM. I’ll recommend every developer must understand
this topic to become master in multi threading.
It helps us in analyzing threads performance,
thread states, CPU consumed by threads, garbage collection and much more. For detailed information see
Generating and analyzing Thread Dumps using VisualVM - step by step detail to setup VisualVM with screenshots
jstack
is very easy way to generate Thread dump and is widely used by
developers. I’ll recommend every developer must understand this topic to
become master in multi threading. For creating Thread dumps we need not
to download any jar or any extra software. For detailed information see
Generating and analyzing Thread Dumps using JSATCK - step by step detail to setup JSTACK with screenshots.
Question 22. What is life cycle of Thread, explain thread states? (Important)
Answer.
Thread states/ Thread life cycle is very basic question, before going deep into concepts we must understand Thread life cycle.
Thread have following states >
- New
- Runnable
- Running
- Waiting/blocked/sleeping
- Terminated (Dead)
Thread states/ Thread life cycle in diagram >
Thread states in detail >
New : When instance of thread is created using new operator it is in
new state, but the start() method has not been invoked on the thread
yet, thread is not eligible to run yet.
Runnable : When start() method is called on thread it enters runnable state.
Running : Thread scheduler selects thread to go fromrunnable to
running state. In running state Thread starts executing by entering
run() method.
Waiting/blocked/sleeping : In this state a thread is not eligible to run.
>Thread is still alive, but currently it’s not eligible to run. In other words.
> How can Thread go from running to waiting state?
By calling wait()
method thread go from running to waiting state. In waiting state it will wait for other threads to release object monitor/lock.
> How can Thread go from running to sleeping state?
By calling sleep()
methodthread go from running to sleeping state. In sleeping state it will wait for sleep time to get over.
Terminated (Dead) : A thread is considered dead when its run() method completes.
Question 23. Are you aware of preemptive scheduling and time slicing?
Answer. In preemptive scheduling, the highest priority thread executes until it enters into the
waiting or dead state.
In time slicing, a thread executes for a certain predefined time and
then enters runnable pool. Than thread can enter running state when
selected by thread scheduler.
Question 24. What are daemon threads?
Answer.
Daemon threads are low priority threads which runs intermittently in background for doing garbage collection.
12 Few salient features of
daemon() threads>
- Thread scheduler schedules these threads only when CPU is idle.
- Daemon threads are service oriented threads, they serves all other threads.
- These threads are created before user threads are created and die after all other user threads dies.
- Priority of daemon threads is always 1 (i.e. MIN_PRIORITY).
- User created threads are non daemon threads.
- JVM can exit when only daemon threads exist in system.
- we can use isDaemon() method to check whether thread is daemon thread or not.
- we can use setDaemon(boolean on) method to make any user method a daemon thread.
- If setDaemon(boolean on) is called on thread after calling start() method than IllegalThreadStateException is thrown.
- You may like to see how daemon threads work, for that you can
use VisualVM or jStack. I have provided Thread dumps over there which
shows daemon threads which were intermittently running in background.
Some of the daemon threads which intermittently run in background are >
"RMI TCP Connection(3)-10.175.2.71" daemon"RMI TCP Connection(idle)" daemon"RMI Scheduler(0)" daemon"C2 CompilerThread1" daemon
"GC task thread#0 (ParallelGC)"
|
Question 25. Why suspend() and resume() methods are deprecated?
Answer.
Suspend() method is
deadlock
prone. If the target thread holds a lock on object when it is
suspended, no thread can lock this object until the target thread is
resumed.
If
the thread that would resume the target thread attempts to lock this
monitor prior to calling resume, it results in deadlock formation.
These
deadlocksare generally called Frozen processes.
Suspend() method puts thread from
running to waiting state. And thread can go from waiting to runnable state only when resume() method is called on thread. It is deprecated method.
Resume() method is only used with suspend() method that’s why it’s also deprecated method.
Question 26. Why destroy() methods is deprecated?
Answer. This question is again going to check your in depth knowledge of thread methods i.e.
destroy() method is
deadlock
prone. If the target thread holds a lock on object when it is
destroyed, no thread can lock this object (Deadlock formed are similar
to deadlock formed when suspend() and resume() methods are used
improperly). It results in deadlock formation. These
deadlocksare generally called Frozen processes.
Additionally you must know calling destroy() method on Threads throw runtimeException i.e. NoSuchMethodError.
Destroy() method puts thread from running to
dead state.
Question 27. As stop() method is deprecated, How can we terminate or stop infinitely running thread in java? (Important)
Answer. This is very interesting question where interviewees thread
basics basic will be tested. Interviewers tend to know user’s knowledge
about main thread’s and thread invoked by main thread.
We will try to address the problem by creating new thread which will
run infinitely until certain condition is satisfied and will be called
by main Thread.
- Infinitely running thread can be stopped using boolean variable.
- Infinitely running thread can be stopped using interrupt() method.
Let’s understand Why stop() method is deprecated :
Stopping a thread with Thread.stop() causes it to release all of the
monitors that it has locked. If any of the objects previously protected
by these monitors were in an inconsistent state, the damaged objects
become visible to other threads, which might lead to unpredictable
behavior.
Question 28. what is significance of yield() method, what state does it put thread in?
yield()
is a native method it’s implementation in java 6 has been changed as
compared to its implementation java 5. As method is native it’s
implementation is provided by JVM.
In java 5, yield() method internally used to call
sleep()
method giving all the other threads of same or higher priority to
execute before yielded thread by leaving allocated CPU for time gap of
15 millisec.
But java 6, calling yield() method gives a hint to the thread
scheduler that the current thread is willing to yield its current use of
a processor. The thread scheduler is free to ignore this hint. So,
sometimes even after using yield() method, you may not notice any
difference in output.
salient features of
yield() method >
- Definition : yield()
method when called on thread gives a hint to the thread scheduler that
the current thread is willing to yield its current use of a
processor.The thread scheduler is free to ignore this hint.
- Thread state
: when yield() method is called on thread it goes from running to
runnable state, not in waiting state. Thread is eligible to run but not
running and could be picked by scheduler at anytime.
- Waiting time : yield() method stops thread for unpredictable time.
- Static method : yield()is a static method, hence calling Thread.yield() causes currently executing thread to yield.
- Native method : implementation of yield() method is provided by JVM.
Let’s see definition of yield() method as given in java.lang.Thread -
public static native void yield();
|
- synchronized block
: thread need not to to acquire object lock before calling
yield()method i.e. yield() method can be called from outside
synchronized block.
Question 29.What is significance of sleep() method in detail, what statedoes it put thread in ?
sleep() is a native method, it’s implementation is provided by JVM.
10 salient features of
sleep() method >
- Definition : sleep()
methods causes current thread to sleep for specified number of
milliseconds (i.e. time passed in sleep method as parameter). Ex-
Thread.sleep(10) causes currently executing thread to sleep for 10
millisec.
- Thread state
: when sleep() is called on thread it goes from running to waiting
state and can return to runnable state when sleep time is up.
- Exception : sleep() method must catch or throw compile time exception i.e. InterruptedException.
- Waiting time : sleep() method have got few options.
- sleep(long millis) - Causes the currently executing thread to sleep for the specified number of milliseconds
public static native void sleep(long millis) throws InterruptedException;
|
- sleep(long millis, int nanos) - Causes the currently executing
thread to sleep for the specified number of milliseconds plus the
specified number of nanoseconds.
public static native void sleep(long millis,int nanos) throws InterruptedException;
|
- static method : sleep()is a static method, causes the currently
executing thread to sleep for the specified number of milliseconds.
- Belongs to which class :sleep() method belongs to java.lang.Thread class.
- synchronized block : thread need not to to acquire object lock
before calling sleep()method i.e. sleep() method can be called from
outside synchronized block.
Question 30. Difference between wait() and sleep() ? (Important)
Answer.
- Should be called from synchronized block :wait() method is always called from synchronized block i.e. wait()
method needs to lock object monitor before object on which it is
called. But sleep() method can be called from outside synchronized
block i.e. sleep() method doesn’t need any object monitor.
- IllegalMonitorStateException : if wait() method is called
without acquiring object lock than IllegalMonitorStateException is
thrown at runtime, but sleep() methodnever throws such exception.
- Belongs to which class : wait() method belongs to java.lang.Object class but sleep() method belongs to java.lang.Thread class.
- Called on object or thread : wait() method is called on objects but sleep() method is called on Threads not objects.
- Thread state
: when wait() method is called on object, thread that holded object’s
monitor goes from running to waiting state and can return to runnable
state only when notify() or notifyAll()method is called on that object.
And later thread scheduler schedules that thread to go from from
runnable to running state.
when sleep() is called on thread it goes from running to waiting state and can return to runnable state when sleep time is up.
- When called from synchronized block
:when wait() method is called thread leaves the object lock. But
sleep()method when called from synchronized block or method thread
doesn’t leaves object lock.
Question 31. Differences and similarities between yield() and sleep()?
Answer.
Differences
yield() and
sleep() :
- Definition : yield() method when called on thread gives a hint
to the thread scheduler that the current thread is willing to yield its
current use of a processor.The thread scheduler is free to ignore this
hint. sleep() methods causes current thread to sleep for specified
number of milliseconds (i.e. time passed in sleep method as parameter).
Ex- Thread.sleep(10) causes currently executing thread to sleep for 10
millisec.
- Thread state
: when sleep() is called on thread it goes from running to waiting
state and can return to runnable state when sleep time is up. when
yield() method is called on thread it goes from running to runnable
state, not in waiting state. Thread is eligible to run but not running
and could be picked by scheduler at anytime.
- Exception : yield() method need not to catch or throw any
exception. But sleep() method must catch or throw compile time exception
i.e. InterruptedException.
- Waiting time : yield() method stops thread for unpredictable
time, that depends on thread scheduler. But sleep() method have got few
options.
- sleep(long millis) - Causes the currently executing thread to sleep for the specified number of milliseconds
- sleep(long millis, int nanos) - Causes the currently executing
thread to sleep for the specified number of milliseconds plus the
specified number of nanoseconds.
similarity between
yield() and
sleep():
> yield() and sleep() method belongs to java.lang.Thread class.
> yield() and sleep() method can be called from outside synchronized block.
> yield() and sleep() method are called on Threads not objects.
Question 32. Mention some guidelines to write thread safe code, most important point we must take care of in multithreading programs?
Answer. In multithreading environment it’s important very important to
write thread safe code,
thread unsafe code can cause a major threat to your application. I have
posted many articles regarding thread safety. So overall this will be
revision of what we have learned so far i.e. writing thread safe healthy
code and avoiding any kind of
deadlocks.
- If method is exposed in multithreading environment and it’s not synchronized (thread unsafe) than it might lead us to race condition, we must try to use synchronized block and synchronized methods. Multiple threads may exist on same object but only one thread of that object can enter synchronized method at a time, though threads on different object can enter same method at same time.
- Even static variables are not thread safe, they are used in
static methods and if static methods are not synchronized then thread on
same or different object can enter method concurrently. Multiple
threads may exist on same or different objects of class but only one thread can enter static synchronized method at a time, we must consider making static methods as synchronized.
- If possible, try to use volatile variables.
If a field is declared volatile all threads see a consistent value for
the variable. Volatile variables at times can be used as alternate to
synchronized methods as well.
- Final variables are thread safe because once assigned some reference of object they cannot point to reference of other object.
s is pointing to String object.
public class MyClass {
final String s=new String("a");
void method(){
s="b"; //compilation error, s cannot point to new reference.
}
}
If final is holding some primitive value it cannot point to other value.
public class MyClass {
final inti=0;
void method(){
i=0; //compilation error, i cannot point to new value.
}
}
- Usage of local variables : If possible try to use local variables, local variables are thread safe, because every thread has its own stack, i.e. every thread has its own local variables and its pushes all the local variables on stack.
public class MyClass {
void method(){
inti=0; //Local variable, is thread safe.
}
}
- Using thread safe collections : Rather than using ArrayList we must
Vector and in place of using HashMap we must use ConcurrentHashMap or
HashTable.
- We must use VisualVM or jstack to detect problems such as deadlocks and time taken by threads to complete in multi threading programs.
- Using ThreadLocal:ThreadLocal
is a class which provides thread-local variables. Every thread has its
own ThreadLocal value that makes ThreadLocal value threadsafe as well.
- Rather than StringBuffer try using immutable classes such as String. Any change to String produces new String.
Question 33. How thread can enter waiting, sleeping and blocked state and how can they go to runnable state ?
Answer. This is very prominently asked question in interview which will test your knowledge about
thread states. And it’s very important for developers to have in depth knowledge of this
thread state
transition. I will try to explain this thread state transition by
framing few sub questions. I hope reading sub questions will be quite
interesting.
> How can Thread go from running to waiting state ?
By calling wait()
method thread go from running to waiting state. In waiting state it will wait for other threads to release object monitor/lock.
> How can Thread return from waiting to runnable state ?
Once notify() or notifyAll()
method is called object monitor/lock becomes available and thread can again return to runnable state.
> How can Thread go from running to sleeping state ?
By calling sleep()
methodthread go from running to
sleeping state. In sleeping state it will wait for sleep time to get over.
> How can Thread return from sleeping to runnable state ?
Once specified sleep time is up thread can again return to runnable state.
Suspend()
method can be used to put thread in waiting state and resume() method is the only way which could put thread in runnable state.
Thread also may go from running to waiting state if it is waiting for
some I/O operation to take place. Once input is available thread may
return to running state.
>When threads are in running state, yield()
method can make thread to go in Runnable state.
Question 34. Difference between notify() and notifyAll() methods, can you write a code to prove your point?
Answer. Goodness. Theoretically you must have heard or you must be aware of differences between
notify() and notifyAll().But have you created program to achieve it? If not let’s do it.
First, I will like give you a brief description of what notify() and notifyAll() methods do.
notify()- Wakes up a single thread that is
waiting
on this object's monitor. If any threads are waiting on this object,
one of them is chosen to be awakened. The choice is random and occurs at
the discretion of the implementation. A thread
waits on an object's monitor by calling one of the wait methods.
The awakened threads will not be able to proceed until the current thread relinquishes the lock on this object.
public final native void notify();
|
notifyAll()- Wakes up all threads that are waiting on this object's
monitor. A thread waits on an object's monitor by calling one of the
wait methods.
The awakened threads will not be able to proceed until the current thread relinquishes the lock on this object.
public final native void notifyAll();
|
Now it’s time to write down a program to prove the point.
Question 35. Does thread leaves object lock when sleep() method is called?
Answer. When
sleep() method is called Thread does not leaves object lock and goes from running to waiting state. Thread
waits for sleep time to over and once sleep time is up it goes from
waiting to runnable state.
Question 36. Does thread leaves object lock when wait() method is called?
Answer. When
wait() method is called Thread leaves the object lock and goes from
running to waiting state. Thread waits for other threads on same object to call notify() or notifyAll() and once any of
notify() or notifyAll() is called it goes from waiting to runnable state and again acquires object lock.
Question 37. What will happen if we don’t override run method?
Answer. This question will test your basic knowledge how start and run methods work internally in Thread Api.
When we call start() method on thread, it internally calls run()
method with newly created thread. So, if we don’t override run() method
newly created thread won’t be called and nothing will happen.
class MyThread extends Thread {
//don't override run() method
}
publicclass DontOverrideRun {
publicstaticvoid main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("main has started.");
MyThread thread1=new MyThread();
thread1.start();
System.out.println("main has ended.");
}
}
/*OUTPUT
main has started.
main has ended.
*/
As we saw in output, we didn’t override run() method that’s why on calling start() method nothing happened.
Question 38. What will happen if we override start method?
Answer. This question will again test your basic core java knowledge
how overriding works at runtime, what what will be called at runtime and
how start and run methods work internally in Thread Api.
When we call start() method on thread, it internally calls run()
method with newly created thread. So, if we override start() method,
run() method will not be called until we write code for calling run()
method.
class MyThread extends Thread {
@Override
publicvoid run() {
System.out.println("in run() method");
}
@Override
publicvoid start(){
System.out.println("In start() method");
}
}
publicclass OverrideStartMethod {
publicstaticvoid main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("main has started.");
MyThread thread1=new MyThread();
thread1.start();
System.out.println("main has ended.");
}
}
/*OUTPUT
main has started.
In start() method
main has ended.
*/
If we note output. we have overridden start method and didn’t called run() method from it, so, run() method wasn’t call.
Question 39. Can we acquire lock on class? What are ways in which you can acquire lock on class?
Answer. Yes, we can acquire lock on
class’s class object in 2 ways to acquire lock on class.
Thread can acquire lock on class’s class object by-
- Entering synchronized block or
Let’s say there is one class MyClass. Now we can create
synchronization block, and parameter passed with synchronization tells
which class has to be synchronized. In below code, we have synchronized
MyClass
synchronized (MyClass.class) {
//thread has acquired lock on MyClass’s class object.
}
- by entering static synchronized methods.
public staticsynchronizedvoid method1() {
//thread has acquired lock on MyRunnable’s class object.
}
As soon as thread entered Synchronization method, thread acquired lock on class’s class object.
Thread will leave lock when it exits static synchronized method.
Question 40. Difference between object lock and class lock?
Answer. It is very important question from multithreading point of view. We must understand
difference between object lock and class lock to answer interview, ocjp answers correctly.
Object lock
|
Class lock
|
Thread can acquire object lock by-
- Entering synchronized block or
- by entering synchronized methods.
|
Thread can acquire lock on class’s class object by-
- Entering synchronized block or
- by entering static synchronized methods.
|
Multiple threads may exist on same object but only one thread of that object can enter synchronized method at a time.
Threads on different object can enter same method at same time.
|
Multiple threads may exist on same or different objects of class but only one thread can enter static synchronized method at a time.
|
Multiple objects of class may exist and every object has it’s own lock.
|
Multiple objects of class may exist but there is always one class’s class object lock available.
|
First let’s acquire object lock by entering synchronized block.
Example-
Let’s say there is one class MyClassand we have created it’s object and
reference to that object is myClass. Now we can create synchronization
block, and parameter passed with synchronization tells which object has
to be synchronized. In below code, we have synchronized object reference
by myClass.
MyClass myClass=newMyclass();
synchronized (myClass) {
}
As
soon thread entered Synchronization block, thread acquired object lock
on object referenced by myClass (by acquiring object’s monitor.)
Thread will leave lock when it exits synchronized block.
|
First let’s acquire lock on class’s class object by entering synchronized block.
Example-
Let’s say there is one class MyClass. Now we can create synchronization
block, and parameter passed with synchronization tells which class has
to be synchronized. In below code, we have synchronized MyClass
synchronized (MyClass.class) {
}
As
soon as thread entered Synchronization block, thread acquired MyClass’s
class object. Thread will leave lock when it exits synchronized block.
|
publicsynchronizedvoid method1() {
}
As soon as thread entered Synchronization method, thread acquired object lock.
Thread will leave lock when it exits synchronized method.
|
public staticsynchronizedvoid method1() {}
As soon as thread entered static Synchronization method, thread acquired lock on class’s class object.
Thread will leave lock when it exits synchronized method.
|
Let’s me give you some tricky situation based question,
Question 41. Suppose you have 2 threads (Thread-1 and
Thread-2) on same object. Thread-1 is in synchronized method1(), can
Thread-2 enter synchronized method2() at same time?
Answer.No, here when Thread-1 is in synchronized method1() it must be holding
lock on object’s monitor and will release lock on object’s monitor only when it exits synchronized method1(). So, Thread-2 will have to
waitfor Thread-1 to release lock on object’s monitor so that it could enter synchronized method2().
Likewise, Thread-2 even cannot enter synchronized method1() which is being executed by Thread-1. Thread-2 will have to
wait for Thread-1 to release lock on object’s monitor so that it could enter synchronized method1().
Now, let’s see a program to prove our point.
Question 42. Suppose you have 2 threads (Thread-1 and
Thread-2) on same object. Thread-1 is in static synchronized method1(),
can Thread-2 enter static synchronized method2() at same time?
Answer.No, here when Thread-1 is in static synchronized method1() it must be holding lock on
class class’s object and will release lock on class’s classobject only when it exits static synchronized method1(). So, Thread-2 will have to
wait for Thread-1 to release lock on class’s classobject so that it could enter static synchronized method2().
Likewise, Thread-2 even cannot enter static synchronized method1() which is being executed by Thread-1. Thread-2 will have to
wait for Thread-1 to release lock on class’s classobject so that it could enter static synchronized method1().
Now, let’s see a program to prove our point.
Question 43. Suppose you have 2 threads (Thread-1 and
Thread-2) on same object. Thread-1 is in synchronized method1(), can
Thread-2 enter static synchronized method2() at same time?
Answer.Yes, here when Thread-1 is in synchronized method1() it must be holding
lock on object’s monitor and Thread-2 can enter static synchronized method2() by acquiring lock on
class’s class object.
Now, let’s see a program to prove our point.
Question 44. Suppose you have thread and it is in synchronized method and now can thread enter other synchronized method from that method?
Answer.Yes, here when thread is in synchronized method it must be holding
lock on object’s monitor and using that lock thread can enter other synchronized method.
Now, let’s see a program to prove our point.
Question 45. Suppose you have thread and it is in static
synchronized method and now can thread enter other static synchronized
method from that method?
Answer. Yes, here when thread is in static synchronized method it must be holding lock on
class’s class object and using that lock thread can enter other static synchronized method.
Now, let’s see a program to prove our point.
Question 46. Suppose you have thread and it is in static
synchronized method and now can thread enter other non static
synchronized method from that method?
Answer.Yes, here when thread is in static synchronized method it must be holding lock on
class’s class object and when it enters synchronized method it will hold
lock on object’s monitor as well.
So, now thread holds 2 locks (it’s also called nested synchronization)-
>first one on class’s class object.
>second one on object’s monitor (This lock will be released when thread exits non static method).
Now, let’s see a program to prove our point.
Question 47. Suppose you have thread and it is in synchronized
method and now can thread enter other static synchronized method from
that method?
Answer.Yes, here when thread is in synchronized method it must be holding
lock on object’s monitor and when it enters static synchronized method it will hold lock on
class’s class object as well.
So, now thread holds 2 locks (it’s also called nested synchronization)-
>first one on
object’s monitor.
>second one on class’s class object.(This lock will be released when thread exits static method).
Now, let’s see a program to prove our point.
Question 48. Suppose you have 2 threads (Thread-1 on object1
and Thread-2 on object2). Thread-1 is in synchronized method1(), can
Thread-2 enter synchronized method2() at same time?
Answer.Yes, here when Thread-1 is in synchronized method1() it must be holding
lock on object1’s monitor. Thread-2 will acquire lock on object2’s monitor and enter synchronized method2().
Likewise, Thread-2 even enter synchronized method1() as well which is
being executed by Thread-1 (because threads are created on different
objects).
Now, let’s see a program to prove our point.
Question 49. Suppose you have 2 threads (Thread-1 on object1
and Thread-2 on object2). Thread-1 is in static synchronized method1(),
can Thread-2 enter static synchronized method2() at same time?
Answer.No, it might confuse you a bit that threads are created on
different objects. But, not to forgot that multiple objects may exist
but there is always one
class’s class object lock available.
Here, when Thread-1 is in static synchronized method1() it must be
holding lock on class class’s object and will release lock on class’s
classobject only when it exits static synchronized method1(). So,
Thread-2 will have to
wait for Thread-1 to release lock on class’s classobject so that it could enter static synchronized method2().
Likewise, Thread-2 even cannot enter static synchronized method1() which is being executed by Thread-1. Thread-2 will have to
wait for Thread-1 to release lock on
class’s classobject so that it could enter static synchronized method1().
Now, let’s see a program to prove our point.
Question 50. Difference between wait() and wait(long timeout), What are
thread states when these method are called?
Answer.
wait()
|
wait(long timeout)
|
When wait()
method is called on object, it causes causes the current thread to wait
until another thread invokes the notify() or notifyAll() method for
this object.
|
wait(long timeout) - Causes the current thread to wait until
either another thread invokes the notify() or notifyAll() methods for
this object, or a specified timeout time has elapsed.
|
When wait() is called on object - Thread enters from running to waiting state.
It waits for some other thread to call notify so that it could enter runnable state.
|
When wait(1000) is called on object - Thread enters from
running to waiting state. Than even if notify() or notifyAll() is not
called after timeout time has elapsed thread will go from waiting to runnable state.
|
Question 51. How can you implement your own Thread Pool in java?
Answer.
What is
ThreadPool?
ThreadPool is a pool of threads which reuses a fixed number of threads to execute tasks.
At any point, at most nThreads threads will be active processing
tasks. If additional tasks are submitted when all threads are active,
they will wait in the queue until a thread is available.
ThreadPool implementation internally uses
LinkedBlockingQueue for adding and removing tasks.
In this post i will be using LinkedBlockingQueue provide by java Api, you can refer this post for
implementing ThreadPool using custom LinkedBlockingQueue.
Need/Advantage of ThreadPool?
Instead of creating new thread every time for executing tasks, we can
create ThreadPool which reuses a fixed number of threads for executing
tasks.
As threads are reused, performance of our application improves drastically.
How ThreadPool works?
We will instantiate ThreadPool, in ThreadPool’s constructor nThreads number of threads are created and started.
ThreadPool threadPool=new ThreadPool(2);
|
Here 2 threads will be created and started in ThreadPool.
Then, threads will enter run() method of ThreadPoolsThread class and will call take() method on taskQueue.
- If tasks are available thread will execute task by entering run() method of task (As tasks executed always implements Runnable).
publicvoid run() {
. . .
while (true) {
. . .
Runnable runnable = taskQueue.take();
runnable.run();
. . .
}
. . .
}
|
- Else waits for tasks to become available.
When tasks are added?
When execute() method of ThreadPool is called, it internally calls put() method on taskQueue to add tasks.
Once tasks are available all waiting threads are notified that task is available.
Question 52. What is significance of using ThreadLocal?
Answer. This question will test your command in multi threading, can
you really create some perfect multithreading application or not.
ThreadLocal is a class which provides thread-local variables.
What is
ThreadLocal ?
ThreadLocal is a class which provides thread-local variables. Every
thread has its own ThreadLocal value that makes ThreadLocal value
threadsafe as well.
For how long Thread holds ThreadLocal value?
Thread holds ThreadLocal value till it hasn’t entered
dead state.
Can one thread see other thread’s ThreadLocal value?
No, thread can see only it’s ThreadLocal value.
Are ThreadLocal variables thread safe. Why?
Yes, ThreadLocal variables are thread safe. As every thread has its
own ThreadLocal value and one thread can’t see other threads ThreadLocal
value.
Application of
ThreadLocal?
- ThreadLocal are used by many web frameworks for maintaining some context (may be session or request) related value.
- In any single threaded application, same thread is assigned
for every request made to same action, so ThreadLocal values will be
available in next request as well.
- In multi threaded application, different thread is assigned
for every request made to same action, so ThreadLocal values will be
different for every request.
- When threads have started at different time they might like to
store time at which they have started. So, thread’s start time can be
stored in ThreadLocal.
Creating ThreadLocal >
private ThreadLocal<String> threadLocal = new ThreadLocal<String>();
|
We will create instance of ThreadLocal. ThreadLocal is a generic class, i will be using String to demonstrate threadLocal.
All threads will see same instance of ThreadLocal, but a thread will be able to see value which was set by it only.
How thread set value of ThreadLocal >
threadLocal.set( new Date().toString());
|
Thread set value of ThreadLocal by calling set(“”) method on threadLocal.
How thread get value of ThreadLocal >
Thread get value of ThreadLocal by calling get() method on threadLocal.
See here for detailed explanation of
threadLocal.
Question 53. What is busy spin?
Answer.
What is
busy spin?
When one thread loops continuously waiting for another thread to signal.
Performance point of view - Busy spin is very bad from performance
point of view, because one thread keeps on looping continuously ( and
consumes CPU) waiting for another thread to signal.
Solution to busy spin -
We must use
sleep() or
wait() and notify() method. Using wait() is better option.
Why using wait() and notify() is much better option to solve busy spin?
Because in case when we use sleep() method, thread will wake up again
and again after specified sleep time until boolean variable is true.
But, in case of wait() thread will wake up only when when notified by
calling
notify() or notifyAll(), hence end up consuming CPU in best possible manner.
Program - Consumer Producer problem with busy spin >
Consumer thread continuously execute (busy spin) in while loop
tillproductionInProcess is true. Once producer thread has ended it will
make boolean variable productionInProcess false and busy spin will be
over.
while(productionInProcess){
System.out.println("BUSY SPIN - Consumer waiting for production to get over");
}
Question 54. Can a constructor be synchronized?
Answer. No, constructor cannot be synchronized. Because constructor
is used for instantiating object, when we are in constructor object is
under creation. So, until object is not instantiated it does not need
any synchronization.
Enclosing constructor in synchronized block will generate compilation error.
Using synchronized in constructor definition will also show compilation error.
COMPILATION ERROR = Illegal modifier for the constructor in type
ConstructorSynchronizeTest; only public, protected & private are
permitted
Though we can use synchronized block inside constructor.
Read More about :
Constructor in java cannot be synchronized
Question 55. Can you find whether thread holds lock on object or not?
Answer. holdsLock(object) method can be used to find out whether current thread holds the lock on monitor of specified object.
holdsLock(object) method returns true if the current thread holds the lock on monitor of specified object.
Question 56. What do you mean by thread starvation?
Answer. When thread does not enough CPU for its execution Thread starvation happens.
Thread starvation may happen in following scenarios >
- Low priority threads gets less CPU (time for execution) as
compared to high priority threads. Lower priority thread may starve away
waiting to get enough CPU to perform calculations.
- In deadlock two threads waits for each other to release lock holded by them on resources. There both Threads starves away to get CPU.
- Thread might be waiting indefinitely for lock on object’s monitor (by calling wait() method), because no other thread is calling notify()/notifAll() method on object. In that case, Thread starves away to get CPU.
- Thread might be waiting indefinitely for lock on object’s
monitor (by calling wait() method), but notify() may be repeatedly
awakening some other threads. In that case also Thread starves away to
get CPU.
Question 57. What is addShutdownHook method in java?
Answer.
addShutdownHook method in java >
- addShutdownHook method registers a new virtual-machine shutdown hook.
- A shutdown hook is a initialized but unstarted thread.
- When JVM starts its shutdown it will start all registered
shutdown hooks in some unspecified order and let them run concurrently.
When JVM (Java virtual machine) shuts down >
- When the last non-daemon thread finishes, or
- when the System.exit is called.
Once JVM’s shutdown has begunnew shutdown hook cannot be registered
neither previously-registered hook can be de-registered. Any attempt
made to do any of these operations causes an IllegalStateException.
For more detail with program read :
Threads addShutdownHook method in java
Question 58. How you can handle uncaught runtime exception generated in run method?
Answer. We can use
setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler method which can handle uncaught unchecked(runtime) exception generated in run() method.
What is setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler method?
setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler method sets the default handler
which is called when a thread terminates due to an uncaught
unchecked(runtime) exception.
setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler method features >
- setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler method sets the default
handler which is called when a thread terminates due to an uncaught
unchecked(runtime) exception.
- setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler is a static method method,
so we can directly call Thread.setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler to
set the default handler to handle uncaught unchecked(runtime) exception.
- It avoids abrupt termination of thread caused by uncaught runtime exceptions.
Defining setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler method >
Thread.setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler(new Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler(){
publicvoid uncaughtException(Thread thread, Throwable throwable) {
System.out.println(thread.getName() + " has thrown " + throwable);
}
});
Question 59. What is ThreadGroup in java, What is default priority
of newly created threadGroup, mention some important ThreadGroup
methods ?
Answer. When program starts JVM creates a ThreadGroup named main.
Unless specified, all newly created threads become members of the main
thread group.
ThreadGroup is initialized with default priority of 10.
ThreadGroup important methods >
- activeGroupCount()
- count of active groups in ThreadGroup.
- activeCount()
- count of active threads in ThreadGroup.
- list()
- list() method has prints ThreadGroups information
- getMaxPriority()
- Method returns the maximum priority of ThreadGroup.
- setMaxPriority(int pri)
- Sets the maximum priority of ThreadGroup.
Question 60. What are thread priorities?
Answer.
Thread Priority range is from 1 to 10.
Where 1 is minimum priority and 10 is maximum priority.
Thread class provides variables of final static int type for setting thread priority.
/* The minimum priority that a thread can have. */
publicfinalstaticintMIN_PRIORITY= 1;
/* The default priority that is assigned to a thread. */
publicfinalstaticintNORM_PRIORITY= 5;
/* The maximum priority that a thread can have. */
publicfinalstaticintMAX_PRIORITY= 10;
Thread with MAX_PRIORITY is likely to get more CPU as compared to low
priority threads. But occasionally low priority thread might get more
CPU. Because thread scheduler schedules thread on discretion of
implementation and
thread behaviour is totally unpredictable.
Thread with MIN_PRIORITY is likely to get less CPU as compared to
high priority threads. But occasionally high priority thread might less
CPU. Because thread scheduler schedules thread on discretion of
implementation and thread behaviour is totally unpredictable.
setPriority()method is used for Changing the priority of thread.
getPriority()method returns the thread’s priority.